Conceptual Confusions and Causal Dynamics
It is argued that rules and norms are conceptually distinct. What is norm is not a rule, and vice versa. Versions of conflating the two are discussed and an argument for distinction given. Objections to the argument are responded to. It is accepted that rules and norms are intimately related, but they are so causally, not conceptually. What norms we live by makes a difference to what rules we acceThis paper argues that rules and norms are conceptually distinct: what is norm is not thereby rule, and vice versa. Versions of conflating the two are discussed and an argument for distinction given. Two objections to the argument are responded to. It is accepted that rules and norms are often intimately related. They are so causally, not conceptually: what norms we live by can make a difference t